This presentation analyzes the ethical obligations of attorneys using generative AI tools, focusing on competence, confidentiality, and candor.
It surveys common use cases-legal research, document drafting, and contract analysis-and critically examines AI 'hallucinations' and the risks of unverified output. ABA Formal Opinion 512 and the Model Rules anchor the discussion: Rule 1.1 competence and the duty to understand a tool's limits, Rule 1.6 confidentiality and the hazards of public models, and Rule 3.3 candor and the obligation to verify. The program addresses supervisory duties under Rules 5.1 and 5.3 and closes with lessons from recent disciplinary actions and judicial standing orders on AI use in court filings.
Attorneys have already been sanctioned, publicly named, and referred to disciplinary authorities for filing briefs with AI-invented cases. The duties of competence, confidentiality, and candor do not bend for new technology-they expand to cover it. This session shows you exactly where the ethical lines fall, what ABA Formal Opinion 512 requires, and how to use generative AI without becoming the next cautionary headline.
Unlimited Viewing Recorded Version for 6 months ( Access information will be emailed 24 hours after the completion of live webinar)